Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Census Places
  • All Census Tracts
  • All Counties
  • All Zip Codes
  • County : Adair Census Tracts
  • County : Adair Zip Codes
  • County : Cherokee Census Tracts
  • County : Cherokee Zip Codes
  • County : Craig Census Tracts
  • County : Craig Zip Codes
  • County : Delaware Census Tracts
  • County : Delaware Zip Codes
  • County : Mayes Census Tracts
  • County : Mayes Zip Codes
  • County : McIntosh Census Tracts
  • County : McIntosh Zip Codes
  • County : Muskogee Census Tracts
  • County : Muskogee Zip Codes
  • County : Nowata Census Tracts
  • County : Nowata Zip Codes
  • County : Ottawa Census Tracts
  • County : Ottawa Zip Codes
  • County : Rogers Census Tracts
  • County : Rogers Zip Codes
  • County : Sequoyah Census Tracts
  • County : Sequoyah Zip Codes
  • County : Tulsa Census Tracts
  • County : Tulsa Zip Codes
  • County : Wagoner Census Tracts
  • County : Wagoner Zip Codes
  • County : Washington Census Tracts
  • County : Washington Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

Current Value:
37.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (34.9%), Washington has a value of 37.9%.
OK Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Washington has a value of 37.9%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (37.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (40.1%).
Prior Value
(40.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:

County: Washington Frequent Physical Distress

13.4%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (14.4%), Washington has a value of 13.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Washington has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (13.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.8%).
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Washington Insufficient Sleep

33.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 33.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (33.8%), Washington has a value of 33.3% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Washington has a value of 33.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (33.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.7%).
Prior Value
(37.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Washington Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:

County: Washington Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

13.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 13.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 13.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Washington has a value of 13.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washington Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
4.1
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 4.1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 4.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (3.8), Washington has a value of 4.1 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Washington has a value of 4.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (4.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8).
Prior Value
(3.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

82.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 82.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 82.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (83.3%), Washington has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(83.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Washington has a value of 82.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (82.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.4%).
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

Current Value:
20.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 20.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 20.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Washington has a value of 20.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Health / Women's Health

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:

County: Washington Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (14.7%), Washington has a value of 13.9%.
OK Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Washington has a value of 13.9%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (13.9%) is less  than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
4.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 4.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (8.7), Washington has a value of 4.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.8), Washington has a value of 4.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Washington (4.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.2).
Prior Value
(5.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Washington Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Violent Crime Rate

239.1
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 239.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 215.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 291.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (428.0), Washington has a value of 239.1 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(428.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Washington has a value of 239.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (239.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (219.8).
Prior Value
(219.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Washington Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (2.50), Washington has a value of 2.50.
OK Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Washington has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Washington Foreign Born Persons

4.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (6.2%), Washington has a value of 4.1%.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Washington has a value of 4.1%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Washington Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Washington Veteran Population

8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.5%), Washington has a value of 8.6%.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Washington has a value of 8.6%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions

11.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 11.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (19.0), Washington has a value of 11.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (11.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.9).
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:

County: Washington Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

24.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (26.7%), Washington has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Washington has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.7%).
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Child Abuse Rate

17.8
Cases per 1,000 children
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 17.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (16.5), Washington has a value of 17.8 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (17.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.9).
Prior Value
(12.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
21.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 21.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 21.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (25.7%), Washington has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Washington has a value of 21.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Washington Linguistic Isolation

1.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 1.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 64 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 1.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2.0%), Washington has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Washington has a value of 1.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Washington People 65+ Living Alone

30.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 30.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (28.8%), Washington has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Washington has a value of 30.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:

County: Washington Households without a Vehicle

4.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 4.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.4%), Washington has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Washington has a value of 4.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Washington Mean Travel Time to Work

20.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 20.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 20.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (22.3), Washington has a value of 20.2 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Washington has a value of 20.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
24.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 24.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (27.9%), Washington has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Washington has a value of 24.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (24.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (22.8%).
Prior Value
(22.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
OK Counties
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (0.3%), Washington has a value of 0.3%.
OK Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Washington has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Washington Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

County: Washington Workers who Drive Alone to Work

79.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 79.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 79.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (79.7%), Washington has a value of 79.1% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(79.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Washington has a value of 79.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Washington Employer Establishments

1,139
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (1,139) is greater  than the previously measured value (1,115).
Prior Value
(1,115)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
52.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 52.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 52.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (55.8%), Washington has a value of 52.7% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Washington has a value of 52.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
55.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 55.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 55.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (57.6%), Washington has a value of 55.5% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Washington has a value of 55.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Washington Size of Labor Force

23,522
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (23,522) is greater and better than the previously measured value (23,127).
Prior Value
(23,127)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Washington Total Employment

17,191
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (17,191) is less  than the previously measured value (17,662).
Prior Value
(17,662)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Washington Total Employment Change

-2.7%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of -2.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -4.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -6.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of -2.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (-4.2%), Washington has a value of -2.7% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(-4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Washington has a value of -2.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (-2.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (-3.5%).
Prior Value
(-3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
4.0%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 4.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 4.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (3.7%), Washington has a value of 4.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Washington has a value of 4.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (4.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.4%).
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Child Food Insecurity Rate

16.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 16.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 16.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (19.1%), Washington has a value of 16.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Washington has a value of 16.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (16.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Food Insecurity Rate

12.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 12.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (14.1%), Washington has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Washington has a value of 12.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (12.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
51.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (52.4%), Washington has a value of 51.9%.
OK Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Washington has a value of 51.9%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 22.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 22.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (22.5%), Washington has a value of 22.3% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (22.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (31.1%).
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Projected Food Insecurity Rate

15.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 15.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 15.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.1%), Washington has a value of 15.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (15.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
40.6%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 40.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 56.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 68.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 40.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 56.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,832 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (55.1%), Washington has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(55.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.0%), Washington has a value of 40.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (40.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (43.9%).
Prior Value
(43.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 5.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 5.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2.9%), Washington has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Washington has a value of 5.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Washington Homeowner Vacancy Rate

2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 2.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 2.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (1.4%), Washington has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Washington has a value of 2.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Washington Homeownership

62.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 62.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 62.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (57.3%), Washington has a value of 62.3% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(57.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Washington has a value of 62.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:

County: Washington Median Household Gross Rent

$879
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of $879 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $788 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $846.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($934), Washington has a value of $879 which is lower and better.
OK Value
($934)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Washington has a value of $879 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$447
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of $447 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $410 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $460.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($470), Washington has a value of $447 which is lower and better.
OK Value
($470)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Washington has a value of $447 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

Current Value:
$1,325
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of $1,325 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,194 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,284.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($1,416), Washington has a value of $1,325 which is lower and better.
OK Value
($1,416)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Washington has a value of $1,325 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

48.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 48.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 48.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (44.9%), Washington has a value of 48.8% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Washington has a value of 48.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Washington Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Washington Severe Housing Problems

10.9%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (13.3%), Washington has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washington has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (10.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.9%).
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

55.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 55.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (55.0%), Washington has a value of 55.8% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (55.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (58.4%).
Prior Value
(58.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

30.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (30.0%), Washington has a value of 30.5% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (30.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (27.6%).
Prior Value
(27.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Washington Income Inequality

0.469
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 0.469 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.451 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.468.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 0.469 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (0.467), Washington has a value of 0.469 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(0.467)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Washington has a value of 0.469 which is lower and better.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Washington Median Household Income

$59,426
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of $59,426 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $56,390 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,411.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of $59,426 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value ($61,364), Washington has a value of $59,426 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
($61,364)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Washington has a value of $59,426 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Washington Per Capita Income

$34,243
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of $34,243 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $29,800 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,318.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of $34,243 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value ($33,630), Washington has a value of $34,243 which is higher and better.
OK Value
($33,630)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Washington has a value of $34,243 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:

County: Washington Households with a 401k Plan

32.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 32.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (35.2%), Washington has a value of 32.9% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Washington has a value of 32.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (32.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (34.5%).
Prior Value
(34.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:
67.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 67.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 67.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (67.4%), Washington has a value of 67.2% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Washington has a value of 67.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (67.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (68.8%).
Prior Value
(68.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:
7.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 7.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (9.3%), Washington has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Washington has a value of 7.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.2%).
Prior Value
(8.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
19.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 19.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 19.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (20.3%), Washington has a value of 19.9% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washington has a value of 19.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 10.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 10.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (11.0%), Washington has a value of 10.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Washington has a value of 10.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (15.0%), Washington has a value of 13.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (13.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 7.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (9.5%), Washington has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Washington has a value of 7.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
64.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 64.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 64.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (64.5%), Washington has a value of 64.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(64.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Washington has a value of 64.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 13.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 13.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (15.2%), Washington has a value of 13.9% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Washington has a value of 13.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Washington Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
25.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 25.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 25.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (23.3%), Washington has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(23.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Washington has a value of 25.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:

County: Washington Youth not in School or Working

1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 1.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (1.8%), Washington has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Washington has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Washington Child Care Centers

17.3
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 17.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 15.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (15.8), Washington has a value of 17.3 which is higher and better.
OK Value
(15.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Washington has a value of 17.3 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (17.3) is greater and better than the previously measured value (6.5).
Prior Value
(6.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
30.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 30.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 30.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (27.3%), Washington has a value of 30.7% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(27.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Washington has a value of 30.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
91.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 91.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (88.9%), Washington has a value of 91.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Washington has a value of 91.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Washington Student-to-Teacher Ratio

17.1
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 17.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 17.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.7), Washington has a value of 17.1 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Washington has a value of 17.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (17.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.7).
Prior Value
(17.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington High School Drop Outs

Current Value:

County: Washington High School Drop Outs

2.4%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 2.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (9.8%), Washington has a value of 2.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (2.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.3%).
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:

County: Washington Annual Particle Pollution

2
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Washington has a value of 2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.

County: Washington Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
184
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (184) is less and better than the previously measured value (216).
Prior Value
(216)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
68.9%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 68.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (70.5%), Washington has a value of 68.9% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Washington has a value of 68.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (68.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (68.9%).
Prior Value
(68.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Washington Access to Parks

19.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 19.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 3.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (56.4%), Washington has a value of 19.6% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (19.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Washington Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Washington Food Environment Index

6.9
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 6.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.3.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 6.9 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.6), Washington has a value of 6.9 which is higher and better.
OK Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Washington has a value of 6.9 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (6.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9).
Prior Value
(6.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Washington Proximity to Highways

5.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 5.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (6.2%), Washington has a value of 5.8% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (5.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.8%).
Prior Value
(5.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Houses Built Prior to 1950

Current Value:

County: Washington Houses Built Prior to 1950

18.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 18.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Washington has a value of 18.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (12.2%), Washington has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Washington has a value of 18.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Washington

Value
Compared to:

County: Washington Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:

County: Washington Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

4,384.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Washington has a value of 4,384.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,241.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,311.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (4,248.0), Washington has a value of 4,384.0 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(4,248.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Washington (4,384.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,734.0).
Prior Value
(3,734.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:

County: Washington Number of Extreme Heat Days

5
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:

County: Washington Number of Extreme Heat Events

4
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
21
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (21) is less and better than the previously measured value (24).
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Washington Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
9
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Washington (9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Washington value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.