Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Census Places
  • All Census Tracts
  • All Counties
  • All Zip Codes
  • County : Adair Census Tracts
  • County : Adair Zip Codes
  • County : Cherokee Census Tracts
  • County : Cherokee Zip Codes
  • County : Craig Census Tracts
  • County : Craig Zip Codes
  • County : Delaware Census Tracts
  • County : Delaware Zip Codes
  • County : Mayes Census Tracts
  • County : Mayes Zip Codes
  • County : McIntosh Census Tracts
  • County : McIntosh Zip Codes
  • County : Muskogee Census Tracts
  • County : Muskogee Zip Codes
  • County : Nowata Census Tracts
  • County : Nowata Zip Codes
  • County : Ottawa Census Tracts
  • County : Ottawa Zip Codes
  • County : Rogers Census Tracts
  • County : Rogers Zip Codes
  • County : Sequoyah Census Tracts
  • County : Sequoyah Zip Codes
  • County : Tulsa Census Tracts
  • County : Tulsa Zip Codes
  • County : Wagoner Census Tracts
  • County : Wagoner Zip Codes
  • County : Washington Census Tracts
  • County : Washington Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

Health / Weight Status

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Health / Weight Status

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

33.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (33.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (34.4%).
Prior Value
(34.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)

County: Tulsa Adults Happy with Weight

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Adults Happy with Weight

47.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 47.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (46.4%), Tulsa has a value of 47.7% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(46.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (48.7%), Tulsa has a value of 47.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (47.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (52.5%).
Prior Value
(52.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Health / Wellness & Lifestyle

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks

68.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 68.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 68.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (65.8%), Tulsa has a value of 68.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (70.1%), Tulsa has a value of 68.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (68.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (74.8%).
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle

33.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (34.9%), Tulsa has a value of 33.7%.
OK Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.6%), Tulsa has a value of 33.7%.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (33.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (37.4%).
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Frequent Physical Distress

Current Value:
13.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 13.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (14.4%), Tulsa has a value of 13.2% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Tulsa has a value of 13.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (13.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.2%).
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Insufficient Sleep

32.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 32.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (33.8%), Tulsa has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Tulsa has a value of 32.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (32.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (34.9%).
Prior Value
(34.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (26.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)

County: Tulsa Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.9%), Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Tulsa Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
3.6
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 3.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 3.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (3.8), Tulsa has a value of 3.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.3), Tulsa has a value of 3.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (3.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.7).
Prior Value
(3.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better

84.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 84.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (83.3%), Tulsa has a value of 84.1% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(83.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.4%), Tulsa has a value of 84.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (84.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (85.1%).
Prior Value
(85.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair

18.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (16.1%), Tulsa has a value of 18.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

Health / Women's Health

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Health / Women's Health

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN

Current Value:
16.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (14.7%), Tulsa has a value of 16.0%.
OK Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.7%), Tulsa has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (16.0%) is less  than the previously measured value (16.1%).
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:
11.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 11.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (8.7), Tulsa has a value of 11.0 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.8), Tulsa has a value of 11.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (11.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0).
Prior Value
(11.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Tulsa Violent Crime Rate

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Violent Crime Rate

685.1
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 685.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 215.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 291.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (428.0), Tulsa has a value of 685.1 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(428.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.5), Tulsa has a value of 685.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (685.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (671.4).
Prior Value
(671.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

Community / Demographics

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Community / Demographics

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Average Household Size

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Average Household Size

2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (2.50), Tulsa has a value of 2.50.
OK Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.60), Tulsa has a value of 2.50.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Foreign Born Persons

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Foreign Born Persons

9.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (6.2%), Tulsa has a value of 9.0%.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Tulsa has a value of 9.0%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Veteran Population

7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.5%), Tulsa has a value of 7.0%.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Tulsa has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

Community / Public Safety

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Community / Public Safety

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions

16.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 16.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (19.0), Tulsa has a value of 16.0 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (16.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.8).
Prior Value
(14.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths

Current Value:
29.3%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 29.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (26.7%), Tulsa has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.3%), Tulsa has a value of 29.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (29.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

Community / Social Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Community / Social Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Child Abuse Rate

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Child Abuse Rate

15.6
Cases per 1,000 children
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 15.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (15.1), Tulsa has a value of 15.6 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(15.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (15.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.8).
Prior Value
(18.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Children in Single-Parent Households

Current Value:
27.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 27.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (25.7%), Tulsa has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Tulsa has a value of 27.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Linguistic Isolation

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Linguistic Isolation

2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 64 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2.0%), Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.2%), Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa People 65+ Living Alone

Current Value:

County: Tulsa People 65+ Living Alone

31.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 31.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 30.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (28.8%), Tulsa has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.4%), Tulsa has a value of 31.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

Community / Transportation

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Community / Transportation

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 6.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 6.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.4%), Tulsa has a value of 6.2% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Tulsa has a value of 6.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Mean Travel Time to Work

19.9
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 19.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 19.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (22.3), Tulsa has a value of 19.9 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Tulsa has a value of 19.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Solo Drivers with a Long Commute

Current Value:
18.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (27.9%), Tulsa has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Tulsa has a value of 18.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (18.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.7%).
Prior Value
(18.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
OK Counties
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 0.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (0.3%), Tulsa has a value of 0.4% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Tulsa has a value of 0.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)

County: Tulsa Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
78.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 80.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 78.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (79.7%), Tulsa has a value of 78.5% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(79.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Tulsa has a value of 78.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

Economy / Employment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Employment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Employer Establishments

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Employer Establishments

19,268
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (19,268) is greater  than the previously measured value (19,015).
Prior Value
(19,015)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
59.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 59.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 59.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 54.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 49.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (55.8%), Tulsa has a value of 59.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (58.5%), Tulsa has a value of 59.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
62.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 62.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 53.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 48.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 62.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 55.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 50.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (57.6%), Tulsa has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (59.6%), Tulsa has a value of 62.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Size of Labor Force

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Size of Labor Force

345,853
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (345,853) is greater and better than the previously measured value (344,025).
Prior Value
(344,025)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Total Employment

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Total Employment

319,207
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (319,207) is less  than the previously measured value (338,966).
Prior Value
(338,966)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Total Employment Change

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Total Employment Change

-5.8%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of -5.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -4.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -6.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of -5.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than -2.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than -5.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (-4.2%), Tulsa has a value of -5.8% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(-4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (-4.3%), Tulsa has a value of -5.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (-5.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (-1.3%).
Prior Value
(-1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force

Current Value:
3.8%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 3.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (3.7%), Tulsa has a value of 3.8% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.1%), Tulsa has a value of 3.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (3.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3.2%).
Prior Value
(3.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Food Insecurity

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
16.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 16.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 16.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (19.1%), Tulsa has a value of 16.8% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.8%), Tulsa has a value of 16.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (16.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (20.3%).
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Food Insecurity Rate

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (14.1%), Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Tulsa has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.1%).
Prior Value
(13.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Households Receiving SNAP with Children

Current Value:
52.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (52.4%), Tulsa has a value of 52.8%.
OK Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.9%), Tulsa has a value of 52.8%.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
22.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 22.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 22.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (22.5%), Tulsa has a value of 22.8% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (22.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (29.1%).
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Projected Food Insecurity Rate

Current Value:
15.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 15.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 15.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.1%), Tulsa has a value of 15.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (15.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.2%).
Prior Value
(19.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program

Current Value:
49.9%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 49.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 56.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 68.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 49.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 56.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,832 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (55.1%), Tulsa has a value of 49.9% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(55.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (42.0%), Tulsa has a value of 49.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (49.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (52.0%).
Prior Value
(52.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Government Assistance

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Households with Cash Public Assistance Income

Current Value:
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2.9%), Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.7%), Tulsa has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Housing & Homes

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Homeowner Vacancy Rate

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Homeowner Vacancy Rate

1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 1.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 1.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 1.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (1.4%), Tulsa has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.1%), Tulsa has a value of 1.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Homeownership

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Homeownership

54.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 54.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 56.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 54.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (57.3%), Tulsa has a value of 54.0% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(57.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.8%), Tulsa has a value of 54.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Median Household Gross Rent

Current Value:
$1,002
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of $1,002 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $788 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $846.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($934), Tulsa has a value of $1,002 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
($934)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,268), Tulsa has a value of $1,002 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage

$548
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of $548 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $410 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $460.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($470), Tulsa has a value of $548 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
($470)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($584), Tulsa has a value of $548 which is lower and better.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs

$1,518
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of $1,518 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than $1,194 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than $1,284.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value ($1,416), Tulsa has a value of $1,518 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
($1,416)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($1,828), Tulsa has a value of $1,518 which is lower and better.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

44.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 44.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 45.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 44.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (44.9%), Tulsa has a value of 44.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Tulsa has a value of 44.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)

County: Tulsa Severe Housing Problems

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Severe Housing Problems

14.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 14.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 14.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (13.3%), Tulsa has a value of 14.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Tulsa has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (14.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.8%).
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

Economy / Income

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Income

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold

57.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 57.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 45.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (55.0%), Tulsa has a value of 57.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (57.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.6%).
Prior Value
(60.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)

27.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 27.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 32.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (30.0%), Tulsa has a value of 27.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (27.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Income Inequality

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Income Inequality

0.486
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 0.486 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.451 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.468.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 0.486 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.445 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 0.470.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (0.467), Tulsa has a value of 0.486 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(0.467)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (0.483), Tulsa has a value of 0.486 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Median Household Income

$65,229
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of $65,229 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $56,390 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $48,411.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of $65,229 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value ($61,364), Tulsa has a value of $65,229 which is higher and better.
OK Value
($61,364)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Tulsa has a value of $65,229 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Per Capita Income

$38,496
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of $38,496 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $29,800 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $25,318.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of $38,496 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value ($33,630), Tulsa has a value of $38,496 which is higher and better.
OK Value
($33,630)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Tulsa has a value of $38,496 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Investment & Personal Finance

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Households with a 401k Plan

Current Value:
37.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 37.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (35.2%), Tulsa has a value of 37.3% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.1%), Tulsa has a value of 37.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (37.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Households with a Savings Account

Current Value:
69.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 69.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (67.4%), Tulsa has a value of 69.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.1%), Tulsa has a value of 69.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (69.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (70.9%).
Prior Value
(70.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Households with Student Loan Debt

Current Value:
10.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 10.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (9.3%), Tulsa has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3%), Tulsa has a value of 10.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (10.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.8%).
Prior Value
(10.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

Economy / Poverty

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Economy / Poverty

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
20.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 20.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 20.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (20.3%), Tulsa has a value of 20.1% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Tulsa has a value of 20.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
10.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 10.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 10.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (11.0%), Tulsa has a value of 10.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Tulsa has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Households Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
15.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (15.0%), Tulsa has a value of 15.0%.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 8.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (9.5%), Tulsa has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Tulsa has a value of 8.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa People Living 200% Above Poverty Level

Current Value:
66.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 66.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 61.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 54.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 66.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 66.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 59.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (64.5%), Tulsa has a value of 66.6% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(64.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.2%), Tulsa has a value of 66.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 14.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 14.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (15.2%), Tulsa has a value of 14.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Tulsa has a value of 14.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)

County: Tulsa Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
24.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 24.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 24.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (23.3%), Tulsa has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(23.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Tulsa has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 2.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (1.8%), Tulsa has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Tulsa has a value of 2.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Child Care Centers

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Child Care Centers

13.6
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 13.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 15.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 12.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (15.8), Tulsa has a value of 13.6 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(15.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0), Tulsa has a value of 13.6 which is higher and better.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (13.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.9).
Prior Value
(4.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Education / Educational Attainment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
33.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (27.3%), Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(27.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Tulsa has a value of 33.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

89.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (88.9%), Tulsa has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Tulsa has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

Education / School Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Education / School Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Student-to-Teacher Ratio

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Student-to-Teacher Ratio

18.3
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.2.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 18.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.7), Tulsa has a value of 18.3 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.4), Tulsa has a value of 18.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (18.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (17.6).
Prior Value
(17.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Education / Student Performance K-12

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa High School Drop Outs

Current Value:

County: Tulsa High School Drop Outs

1.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 1.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (9.8%), Tulsa has a value of 1.8% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (1.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (10.5%).
Prior Value
(10.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

Environmental Health / Air

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Air

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Annual Ozone Air Quality

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Annual Ozone Air Quality

4
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Tulsa has a value of 4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (4) is less and better than the previously measured value (5).
Prior Value
(5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Annual Particle Pollution

Current Value:
4
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to Air Quality Index, Tulsa has a value of 4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that particle pollution levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air

Current Value:
79,522
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (79,522) is less and better than the previously measured value (144,920).
Prior Value
(144,920)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Built Environment

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Access to Exercise Opportunities

Current Value:
92.2%
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 92.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 51.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 92.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 47.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (70.5%), Tulsa has a value of 92.2% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.1%), Tulsa has a value of 92.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (92.2%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (92.1%).
Prior Value
(92.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Access to Parks

61.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 61.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 10.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 3.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (56.4%), Tulsa has a value of 61.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (61.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.8%).
Prior Value
(40.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Tulsa Food Environment Index

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Food Environment Index

7.4
(2024)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 7.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.3.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 7.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 7.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 6.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.6), Tulsa has a value of 7.4 which is higher and better.
OK Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.7), Tulsa has a value of 7.4 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (7.4) is greater and better than the previously measured value (7.3).
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Proximity to Highways

Current Value:

County: Tulsa Proximity to Highways

7.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 7.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (6.2%), Tulsa has a value of 7.7% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (7.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.9%).
Prior Value
(7.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Houses Built Prior to 1950

Current Value:
11.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Tulsa has a value of 11.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (12.2%), Tulsa has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Tulsa has a value of 11.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa PBT Released

Current Value:

County: Tulsa PBT Released

15,117
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (15,117) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (9,496).
Prior Value
(9,496)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

Environmental Health / Weather & Climate

County: Tulsa

Value
Compared to:

County: Tulsa Daily Dose of UV Irradiance

Current Value:
4,581.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Tulsa has a value of 4,581.0 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4,241.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,311.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (4,248.0), Tulsa has a value of 4,581.0 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(4,248.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (4,581.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (3,920.0).
Prior Value
(3,920.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Number of Extreme Heat Days

Current Value:
3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1).
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Number of Extreme Heat Events

Current Value:
0
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0).
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Number of Extreme Precipitation Days

Current Value:
22
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (22) is less and better than the previously measured value (24).
Prior Value
(24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Tulsa Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse

Current Value:
4
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Tulsa (4) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (2).
Prior Value
(2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Tulsa value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.