Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Frequent Physical Distress
County: McIntosh Frequent Physical Distress
17.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Insufficient Sleep
County: McIntosh Insufficient Sleep
36.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
County: McIntosh Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: McIntosh Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
16.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
County: McIntosh Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
4.8
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
County: McIntosh Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
80.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(79.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
County: McIntosh Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
26.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Women's Health
Health / Women's Health
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
9.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
15.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2018)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Violent Crime Rate
County: McIntosh Violent Crime Rate
247.5
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(428.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(179.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Demographics
Community / Demographics
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Average Household Size
County: McIntosh Average Household Size
2.60
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Foreign Born Persons
County: McIntosh Foreign Born Persons
0.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Veteran Population
County: McIntosh Veteran Population
11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Public Safety
Community / Public Safety
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
42.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(33.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: McIntosh Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
50.0%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(44.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Social Environment
Community / Social Environment
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Child Abuse Rate
County: McIntosh Child Abuse Rate
16.9
Cases per 1,000 children
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(15.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(23.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Children in Single-Parent Households
County: McIntosh Children in Single-Parent Households
26.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Linguistic Isolation
County: McIntosh Linguistic Isolation
0.2%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh People 65+ Living Alone
County: McIntosh People 65+ Living Alone
23.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Transportation
Community / Transportation
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Households without a Vehicle
County: McIntosh Households without a Vehicle
5.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Mean Travel Time to Work
County: McIntosh Mean Travel Time to Work
28.2
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
County: McIntosh Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
40.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: McIntosh Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: McIntosh Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: McIntosh Workers who Drive Alone to Work
74.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Employment
Economy / Employment
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Employer Establishments
County: McIntosh Employer Establishments
341
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(341)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: McIntosh Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
38.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: McIntosh Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
40.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Size of Labor Force
County: McIntosh Size of Labor Force
7,597
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(7,554)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Total Employment
County: McIntosh Total Employment
2,971
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(2,944)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Total Employment Change
County: McIntosh Total Employment Change
0.9%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(-4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(-6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
County: McIntosh Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
6.2%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Economy / Food Insecurity
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: McIntosh Child Food Insecurity Rate
23.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Food Insecurity Rate
County: McIntosh Food Insecurity Rate
17.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households Receiving SNAP with Children
County: McIntosh Households Receiving SNAP with Children
39.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: McIntosh Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
32.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(41.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Projected Food Insecurity Rate
County: McIntosh Projected Food Insecurity Rate
20.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
County: McIntosh Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
83.3%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,832 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(55.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Government Assistance
Economy / Government Assistance
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
County: McIntosh Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
1.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Economy / Housing & Homes
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Homeowner Vacancy Rate
County: McIntosh Homeowner Vacancy Rate
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Homeownership
County: McIntosh Homeownership
48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(57.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Median Household Gross Rent
County: McIntosh Median Household Gross Rent
$700
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($934)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
County: McIntosh Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
$367
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($470)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
County: McIntosh Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
$1,110
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($1,416)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: McIntosh Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
48.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: McIntosh Severe Housing Problems
County: McIntosh Severe Housing Problems
13.0%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Economy / Income
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
39.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(50.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
38.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(30.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Income Inequality
County: McIntosh Income Inequality
0.471
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(0.467)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Median Household Income
County: McIntosh Median Household Income
$43,467
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
($61,364)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Per Capita Income
County: McIntosh Per Capita Income
$24,967
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
($33,630)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Households with a 401k Plan
County: McIntosh Households with a 401k Plan
23.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Households with a Savings Account
County: McIntosh Households with a Savings Account
59.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(61.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Households with Student Loan Debt
County: McIntosh Households with Student Loan Debt
4.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Poverty
Economy / Poverty
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh Children Living Below Poverty Level
30.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh Families Living Below Poverty Level
16.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh Households Living Below Poverty Level
22.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
13.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
County: McIntosh People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
54.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh People Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh People Living Below Poverty Level
22.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: McIntosh Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: McIntosh Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
33.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(23.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Youth not in School or Working
County: McIntosh Youth not in School or Working
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Child Care Centers
County: McIntosh Child Care Centers
28.9
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(15.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Education / Educational Attainment
Education / Educational Attainment
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: McIntosh People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: McIntosh People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
86.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / School Environment
Education / School Environment
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Student-to-Teacher Ratio
County: McIntosh Student-to-Teacher Ratio
16.7
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Student Performance K-12
Education / Student Performance K-12
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh High School Drop Outs
County: McIntosh High School Drop Outs
2.0%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Environmental Health / Built Environment
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Access to Exercise Opportunities
County: McIntosh Access to Exercise Opportunities
51.0%
(2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Access to Parks
County: McIntosh Access to Parks
43.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(35.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Food Environment Index
County: McIntosh Food Environment Index
6.5
(2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Proximity to Highways
County: McIntosh Proximity to Highways
5.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Houses Built Prior to 1950
County: McIntosh Houses Built Prior to 1950
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
County: McIntosh Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
4,454.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(4,248.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(3,886.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Heat Days
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Heat Days
2
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Heat Events
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Heat Events
0
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
County: McIntosh Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
22
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(33)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
County: McIntosh Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
3
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
