Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
County: Cherokee Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
36.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Frequent Physical Distress
County: Cherokee Frequent Physical Distress
16.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Insufficient Sleep
County: Cherokee Insufficient Sleep
36.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(33.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(26.7%)
County: Cherokee Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
County: Cherokee Poor Physical Health: 14+ Days
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Cherokee Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
County: Cherokee Poor Physical Health: Average Number of Days
4.7
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(3.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
County: Cherokee Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Good or Better
80.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(80.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
County: Cherokee Self-Reported General Health Assessment: Poor or Fair
23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Women's Health
Health / Women's Health
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
County: Cherokee Adults Who Visited an OB/GYN
13.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: Cherokee Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
9.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(8.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(10.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cherokee Violent Crime Rate
County: Cherokee Violent Crime Rate
233.6
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(428.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(225.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Demographics
Community / Demographics
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Average Household Size
County: Cherokee Average Household Size
2.50
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.50)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Foreign Born Persons
County: Cherokee Foreign Born Persons
3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Cherokee Veteran Population
County: Cherokee Veteran Population
7.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Public Safety
Community / Public Safety
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
County: Cherokee Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Collisions
14.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(19.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(15.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: Cherokee Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
15.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(26.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Social Environment
Community / Social Environment
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Child Abuse Rate
County: Cherokee Child Abuse Rate
19.2
Cases per 1,000 children
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(16.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(18.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Children in Single-Parent Households
County: Cherokee Children in Single-Parent Households
27.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Linguistic Isolation
County: Cherokee Linguistic Isolation
1.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 64 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee People 65+ Living Alone
County: Cherokee People 65+ Living Alone
28.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(28.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Community / Transportation
Community / Transportation
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Households without a Vehicle
County: Cherokee Households without a Vehicle
6.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Cherokee Mean Travel Time to Work
24.8
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
County: Cherokee Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
30.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Cherokee Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2013-2017)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Cherokee Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Cherokee Workers who Drive Alone to Work
75.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Employment
Economy / Employment
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Employer Establishments
County: Cherokee Employer Establishments
768
Number of Establishments
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(755)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Cherokee Female Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(55.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(58.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
County: Cherokee Population 16+ in Civilian Labor Force
53.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(57.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Size of Labor Force
County: Cherokee Size of Labor Force
21,225
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(21,138)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Total Employment
County: Cherokee Total Employment
8,667
Paid Employees
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9,422)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Total Employment Change
County: Cherokee Total Employment Change
-8.0%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(-4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(-4.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
County: Cherokee Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
4.3%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Food Insecurity
Economy / Food Insecurity
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Cherokee Child Food Insecurity Rate
19.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Food Insecurity Rate
County: Cherokee Food Insecurity Rate
16.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Households Receiving SNAP with Children
County: Cherokee Households Receiving SNAP with Children
49.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(52.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
County: Cherokee Projected Child Food Insecurity Rate
25.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(33.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Projected Food Insecurity Rate
County: Cherokee Projected Food Insecurity Rate
18.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
County: Cherokee Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
69.0%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,832 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(55.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Government Assistance
Economy / Government Assistance
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
County: Cherokee Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Housing & Homes
Economy / Housing & Homes
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Homeowner Vacancy Rate
County: Cherokee Homeowner Vacancy Rate
1.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Homeownership
County: Cherokee Homeownership
54.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(57.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Median Household Gross Rent
County: Cherokee Median Household Gross Rent
$773
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($934)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($1,268)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
County: Cherokee Median Monthly Owner Costs for Households without a Mortgage
$389
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($470)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($584)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
County: Cherokee Mortgaged Owners Median Monthly Household Costs
$1,194
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
($1,416)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($1,828)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
County: Cherokee Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
43.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
County: Cherokee Severe Housing Problems
County: Cherokee Severe Housing Problems
13.3%
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Income
Economy / Income
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
44.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(55.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(44.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
35.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(35.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Income Inequality
County: Cherokee Income Inequality
0.472
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(0.467)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(0.483)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Median Household Income
County: Cherokee Median Household Income
$52,410
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
($61,364)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Per Capita Income
County: Cherokee Per Capita Income
$28,178
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
($33,630)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
Economy / Investment & Personal Finance
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Households with a 401k Plan
County: Cherokee Households with a 401k Plan
28.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(35.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Households with a Savings Account
County: Cherokee Households with a Savings Account
61.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(67.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Households with Student Loan Debt
County: Cherokee Households with Student Loan Debt
7.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(9.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Economy / Poverty
Economy / Poverty
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee Children Living Below Poverty Level
25.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Families Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee Families Living Below Poverty Level
14.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Households Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee Households Living Below Poverty Level
20.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(20.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(9.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
County: Cherokee People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
57.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee People Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee People Living Below Poverty Level
20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
County: Cherokee Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
County: Cherokee Young Children Living Below Poverty Level
32.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(23.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Youth not in School or Working
County: Cherokee Youth not in School or Working
1.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Child Care Centers
County: Cherokee Child Care Centers
30.4
Per 1,000 population under age 5
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(15.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Education / Educational Attainment
Education / Educational Attainment
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
County: Cherokee People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
28.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
County: Cherokee People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
88.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / School Environment
Education / School Environment
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Student-to-Teacher Ratio
County: Cherokee Student-to-Teacher Ratio
14.7
Students per teacher
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,125 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Education / Student Performance K-12
Education / Student Performance K-12
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee High School Drop Outs
County: Cherokee High School Drop Outs
0.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(9.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Environmental Health / Air
Environmental Health / Air
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Annual Ozone Air Quality
County: Cherokee Annual Ozone Air Quality
1
(2015-2017)
Compared to:
Air Quality Index
The American Lung Association (ALA) assigns grades A-F to counties (A=1; B=2; C=3; D=4; F=5), based on average annual number of days that ozone levels exceeded U.S. standards during the three year measurement period. The five-point grading scale was used for the distribution (Green = <2; Yellow = 2 - 3; Red = >3). The air quality data is collected by the EPA and summarized by the ALA.
Prior Value
(1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air
County: Cherokee Recognized Carcinogens Released into Air
0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Built Environment
Environmental Health / Built Environment
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Access to Exercise Opportunities
County: Cherokee Access to Exercise Opportunities
58.3%
(2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,096 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(58.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Access to Parks
County: Cherokee Access to Parks
15.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(56.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(6.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cherokee Food Environment Index
County: Cherokee Food Environment Index
6.0
(2024)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,108 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Proximity to Highways
County: Cherokee Proximity to Highways
2.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(2.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
Environmental Health / Toxins & Contaminants
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Houses Built Prior to 1950
County: Cherokee Houses Built Prior to 1950
5.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee PBT Released
County: Cherokee PBT Released
0
Pounds
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
Environmental Health / Weather & Climate
County: Cherokee
Value
Compared to:
County: Cherokee Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
County: Cherokee Daily Dose of UV Irradiance
4,246.0
Joule per square meter
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(4,248.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(3,816.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Heat Days
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Heat Days
1
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Heat Events
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Heat Events
0
Events
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
County: Cherokee Number of Extreme Precipitation Days
21
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(32)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cherokee Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
County: Cherokee Weeks of Moderate Drought or Worse
3
Weeks per year
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
