Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Binge Drink
County: Washington Adults who Binge Drink
12.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Washington Adults who Drink Excessively
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Washington Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
17.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
County: Washington Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults with Cancer
County: Washington Adults with Cancer
8.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
24.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 39 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
187.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(175.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(182.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
18.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 51 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
50.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
24.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Washington All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington All Cancer Incidence Rate
450.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(443.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(453.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
135.0
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(137.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Washington Cancer: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Washington Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
79.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Colon Cancer Screening
County: Washington Colon Cancer Screening
62.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Washington Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
65.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
43.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(39.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
County: Washington Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
9.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
67.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Washington Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
67.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Washington Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Washington Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
39.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
13.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 41 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Washington Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
96.8
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(100.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(94.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / County Health Rankings
Health / County Health Rankings
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Clinical Care Ranking
County: Washington Clinical Care Ranking
6
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Washington Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Washington Health Behaviors Ranking
9
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Washington Morbidity Ranking
County: Washington Morbidity Ranking
21
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Washington Mortality Ranking
County: Washington Mortality Ranking
20
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Washington Physical Environment Ranking
County: Washington Physical Environment Ranking
45
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Washington Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: Washington Social and Economic Factors Ranking
26
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Health / Diabetes
Health / Diabetes
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Washington Adults 20+ with Diabetes
10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
12.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
23.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(31.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Washington Diabetes: Medicare Population
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Disabilities
Health / Disabilities
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Washington Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
25.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Children with a Disability
County: Washington Children with a Disability
6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
7.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Disability
County: Washington Persons with a Disability
17.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Washington Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
8.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Washington Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
24.9
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(17.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
County: Washington Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
75.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(74.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Washington Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
74.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
85.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Washington Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
79.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(78.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with HMO Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults with HMO Health Insurance
11.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
14.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
23.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with PPO Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults with PPO Health Insurance
30.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults without Health Insurance
County: Washington Adults without Health Insurance
11.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Children with Health Insurance
County: Washington Children with Health Insurance
91.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(90.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
County: Washington Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
13.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
County: Washington Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
29.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(28.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Washington Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
122
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(118)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with Health Insurance
County: Washington Persons with Health Insurance
83.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Washington Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,525.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2,983.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1,945.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Washington Primary Care Provider Rate
44
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(59)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(42)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Information Technology
Health / Health Information Technology
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet
County: Washington Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet
30.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(29.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Adults with Internet Access
County: Washington Adults with Internet Access
90.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(93.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households with a Computer
County: Washington Households with a Computer
85.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(84.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households with a Smartphone
County: Washington Households with a Smartphone
80.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(78.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Washington Households with an Internet Subscription
84.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(85.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Washington Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
92.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Washington Persons with an Internet Subscription
88.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
19.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
28.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Washington Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Washington Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
7.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Washington Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
78.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
County: Washington Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
15.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
33.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
63.7
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(41.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(29.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
264.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(246.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
County: Washington Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Washington Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Cholesterol Test History
County: Washington Cholesterol Test History
83.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Washington Heart Failure: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Washington High Blood Pressure Prevalence
40.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Washington High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Washington High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
38.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Washington Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
63.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Washington Hypertension: Medicare Population
71.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washington Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Washington Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
17.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Washington COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(Dec 2, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Washington COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
9.45
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.67)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.77)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washington Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Washington Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Washington Babies with Low Birthweight
7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: Washington Babies with Very Low Birthweight
1.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Infant Mortality Rate
County: Washington Infant Mortality Rate
7.9
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Washington Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
72.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(77.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Washington Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
5.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: Washington Preterm Births
County: Washington Preterm Births
11.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
County: Washington Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
15.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Washington Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
21.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Depression: Medicare Population
County: Washington Depression: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Frequent Mental Distress
County: Washington Frequent Mental Distress
15.7%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: Washington Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
8.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Washington Mental Health Provider Rate
336
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(426)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(315)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Washington Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
16.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Washington Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
5.6
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Health / Mortality Data
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Life Expectancy
County: Washington Life Expectancy
75.0
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(74.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Premature Death
County: Washington Premature Death
9,970.5
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10,334.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
County: Washington Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
45.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
County: Washington Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
78.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
County: Washington Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
39.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Washington Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
37.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Washington Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
38.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Disability
35.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
13.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
5.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
5.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Washington Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
13.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
43.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Washington Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Washington Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
13.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Washington Adults who Visited a Dentist
48.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Dentist Rate
County: Washington Dentist Rate
56
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(55)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Washington Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
15.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with Arthritis
County: Washington Adults with Arthritis
30.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Washington Adults with Kidney Disease
3.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
18.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Washington Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Washington Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Washington Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
35.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Washington Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
23.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Washington Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
12.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Washington Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Washington Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
65.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
10.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
21.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
49.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(64.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults with COPD
County: Washington Adults with COPD
8.7%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults with Current Asthma
County: Washington Adults with Current Asthma
11.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
County: Washington Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
39.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(60.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Washington Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Washington Asthma: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington COPD: Medicare Population
County: Washington COPD: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Washington Chlamydia Incidence Rate
331.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(519.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(349.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Washington Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
164.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(257.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(192.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington HIV Prevalence Rate
County: Washington HIV Prevalence Rate
116.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Value
(210.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(120.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Washington Syphilis Incidence Rate
1.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Washington Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Washington Adults who Smoke
County: Washington Adults who Smoke
18.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Washington Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Washington Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
6.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Washington Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Washington Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
2.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Washington Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
31.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(30.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Washington Adults Happy with Weight
County: Washington Adults Happy with Weight
47.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
County: Washington
Value
Compared to:
County: Washington Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks
County: Washington Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks
69.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(74.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
