Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults who Binge Drink
County: Tulsa Adults who Binge Drink
13.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Tulsa Adults who Drink Excessively
14.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Tulsa Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
24.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults with Cancer
County: Tulsa Adults with Cancer
6.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
21.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 39 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
165.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(175.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(168.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
15.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 51 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
40.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(42.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
20.2
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Tulsa All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa All Cancer Incidence Rate
472.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(443.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(473.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
137.8
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(137.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
8.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Tulsa Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
77.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Colon Cancer Screening
County: Tulsa Colon Cancer Screening
60.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Tulsa Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
65.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
38.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(39.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
County: Tulsa Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
8.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
57.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Tulsa Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
69.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Tulsa Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
47.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(47.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
13.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 41 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
130.6
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(100.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(122.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / County Health Rankings
Health / County Health Rankings
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Clinical Care Ranking
County: Tulsa Clinical Care Ranking
1
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Tulsa Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Tulsa Health Behaviors Ranking
10
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Tulsa Morbidity Ranking
County: Tulsa Morbidity Ranking
27
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Tulsa Mortality Ranking
County: Tulsa Mortality Ranking
15
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Tulsa Physical Environment Ranking
County: Tulsa Physical Environment Ranking
22
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Tulsa Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: Tulsa Social and Economic Factors Ranking
21
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Health / Diabetes
Health / Diabetes
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Tulsa Adults 20+ with Diabetes
10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
10.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
22.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(31.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Diabetes: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Disabilities
Health / Disabilities
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Tulsa Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
25.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Children with a Disability
County: Tulsa Children with a Disability
4.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Tulsa Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
5.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with a Disability
County: Tulsa Persons with a Disability
13.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Tulsa Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
3.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Tulsa Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
2.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Tulsa Persons with a Vision Difficulty
2.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Tulsa Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Tulsa Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
18.9
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
County: Tulsa Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
72.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(72.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Tulsa Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
72.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
County: Tulsa Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
84.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(90.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Tulsa Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
78.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(78.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with HMO Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Adults with HMO Health Insurance
13.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with PPO Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Adults with PPO Health Insurance
33.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults without Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Adults without Health Insurance
12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Children with Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Children with Health Insurance
92.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(91.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
County: Tulsa Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
11.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
28.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(28.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Tulsa Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
161
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(149)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with Health Insurance
County: Tulsa Persons with Health Insurance
83.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(82.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Tulsa Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
County: Tulsa Persons with Private Health Insurance Only
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
County: Tulsa Persons with Public Health Insurance Only
25.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
2,755.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2,983.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(2,906.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Tulsa Primary Care Provider Rate
105
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(59)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(109)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Information Technology
Health / Health Information Technology
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
31.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(29.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Adults with Internet Access
County: Tulsa Adults with Internet Access
91.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(95.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households with a Computer
County: Tulsa Households with a Computer
88.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(87.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households with a Smartphone
County: Tulsa Households with a Smartphone
84.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(83.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Tulsa Households with an Internet Subscription
89.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(85.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Tulsa Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
94.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Tulsa Persons with an Internet Subscription
91.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
16.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
23.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Tulsa Adults who Experienced a Stroke
3.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Tulsa Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
6.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
77.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
County: Tulsa Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
12.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
43.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
24.9
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(39.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(23.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
256.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(246.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
County: Tulsa Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Cholesterol Test History
County: Tulsa Cholesterol Test History
81.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Heart Failure: Medicare Population
13.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Tulsa High Blood Pressure Prevalence
36.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Tulsa High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Tulsa High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
36.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
60.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(59.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Hypertension: Medicare Population
67.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(67.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
22.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
13.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Tulsa COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
1.8
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(Dec 2, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
9.21
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.67)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
52.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Tulsa Babies with Low Birthweight
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: Tulsa Babies with Very Low Birthweight
1.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Infant Mortality Rate
County: Tulsa Infant Mortality Rate
7.0
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Tulsa Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Tulsa Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
67.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(70.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Tulsa Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
5.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: Tulsa Preterm Births
County: Tulsa Preterm Births
11.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
County: Tulsa Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
15.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Tulsa Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
24.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
21.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Tulsa Depression: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Depression: Medicare Population
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Frequent Mental Distress
County: Tulsa Frequent Mental Distress
15.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: Tulsa Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
9.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Tulsa Mental Health Provider Rate
479
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(426)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(471)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Tulsa Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
17.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Tulsa Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
5.3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Health / Mortality Data
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Life Expectancy
County: Tulsa Life Expectancy
75.2
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(74.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Premature Death
County: Tulsa Premature Death
9,771.7
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10,334.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
County: Tulsa Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
45.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
County: Tulsa Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
76.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
43.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
40.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
42.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Disability
34.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
15.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
6.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
12.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
38.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Tulsa Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
14.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Tulsa Adults who Visited a Dentist
48.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Dentist Rate
County: Tulsa Dentist Rate
71
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(70)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Tulsa Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
14.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with Arthritis
County: Tulsa Adults with Arthritis
23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Tulsa Adults with Kidney Disease
3.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
8.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
19.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
37.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Tulsa Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
23.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Tulsa Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
16.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Tulsa Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Tulsa Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
65.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(55.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
10.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
19.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Tulsa Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
59.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(64.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
7.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults with COPD
County: Tulsa Adults with COPD
7.1%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults with Current Asthma
County: Tulsa Adults with Current Asthma
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
48.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(60.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Tulsa Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa Asthma: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa COPD: Medicare Population
County: Tulsa COPD: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Chlamydia Incidence Rate
604.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(519.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(643.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
346.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(257.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(388.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa HIV Prevalence Rate
County: Tulsa HIV Prevalence Rate
315.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Value
(210.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(310.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Tulsa Syphilis Incidence Rate
43.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Tulsa
Value
Compared to:
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Tulsa Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Tulsa Adults who Smoke
County: Tulsa Adults who Smoke
17.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Tulsa Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Tulsa Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
6.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Tulsa Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Tulsa Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
