Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults who Binge Drink
County: McIntosh Adults who Binge Drink
11.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults who Drink Excessively
County: McIntosh Adults who Drink Excessively
11.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: McIntosh Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
27.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
County: McIntosh Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
1.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults with Cancer
County: McIntosh Adults with Cancer
9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
18.5
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 39 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
187.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(175.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(181.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
13.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 51 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
66.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
20.6
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: McIntosh All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh All Cancer Incidence Rate
416.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(443.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(406.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
95.7
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(83.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Cancer: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Cancer: Medicare Population
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: McIntosh Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
78.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Colon Cancer Screening
County: McIntosh Colon Cancer Screening
56.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: McIntosh Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
63.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
33.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(39.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
County: McIntosh Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
9.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
80.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(80.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: McIntosh Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
60.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: McIntosh Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
32.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
16.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 41 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
72.2
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(100.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / County Health Rankings
Health / County Health Rankings
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Clinical Care Ranking
County: McIntosh Clinical Care Ranking
58
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: McIntosh Health Behaviors Ranking
County: McIntosh Health Behaviors Ranking
64
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: McIntosh Morbidity Ranking
County: McIntosh Morbidity Ranking
64
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: McIntosh Mortality Ranking
County: McIntosh Mortality Ranking
37
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: McIntosh Physical Environment Ranking
County: McIntosh Physical Environment Ranking
39
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: McIntosh Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: McIntosh Social and Economic Factors Ranking
76
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Health / Diabetes
Health / Diabetes
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ with Diabetes
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(9.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
15.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
31.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(31.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Diabetes: Medicare Population
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Disabilities
Health / Disabilities
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: McIntosh Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
36.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Children with a Disability
County: McIntosh Children with a Disability
2.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: McIntosh Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
7.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with a Disability
County: McIntosh Persons with a Disability
23.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: McIntosh Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
8.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: McIntosh Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: McIntosh Persons with a Vision Difficulty
4.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: McIntosh Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
14.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: McIntosh Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
26.9
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(35.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
County: McIntosh Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
71.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: McIntosh Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
76.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
County: McIntosh Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
77.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: McIntosh Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
75.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(74.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with HMO Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Adults with HMO Health Insurance
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
15.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
31.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with PPO Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Adults with PPO Health Insurance
23.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults without Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Adults without Health Insurance
13.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Children with Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Children with Health Insurance
90.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(88.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
County: McIntosh Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
16.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
County: McIntosh Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
29.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(28.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: McIntosh Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
108
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(99)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with Health Insurance
County: McIntosh Persons with Health Insurance
79.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(78.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
3,113.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2,983.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,442.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Primary Care Provider Rate
County: McIntosh Primary Care Provider Rate
10
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(59)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Information Technology
Health / Health Information Technology
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
25.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(29.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults with Internet Access
County: McIntosh Adults with Internet Access
78.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(89.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households with a Computer
County: McIntosh Households with a Computer
77.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(76.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households with a Smartphone
County: McIntosh Households with a Smartphone
71.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households with an Internet Subscription
County: McIntosh Households with an Internet Subscription
71.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(85.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: McIntosh Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
87.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: McIntosh Persons with an Internet Subscription
76.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
22.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
35.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: McIntosh Adults who Experienced a Stroke
5.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: McIntosh Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
10.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: McIntosh Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
82.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
17.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
54.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
58.6
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2017)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(47.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(64.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
300.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(246.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
County: McIntosh Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Cholesterol Test History
County: McIntosh Cholesterol Test History
83.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Heart Failure: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: McIntosh High Blood Pressure Prevalence
46.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: McIntosh High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: McIntosh High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
43.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
64.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(64.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Hypertension: Medicare Population
72.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
28.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Stroke: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
18.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: McIntosh COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
16.7
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(Dec 2, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
4.50
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.67)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.00)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
40.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(36.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Babies with Low Birthweight
County: McIntosh Babies with Low Birthweight
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: McIntosh Babies with Very Low Birthweight
2.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Infant Mortality Rate
County: McIntosh Infant Mortality Rate
7.7
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 47 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(7.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(15.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: McIntosh Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
68.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(58.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: McIntosh Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
16.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(14.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: McIntosh Preterm Births
County: McIntosh Preterm Births
7.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
County: McIntosh Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
15.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: McIntosh Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
23.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
25.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Depression: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Depression: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Frequent Mental Distress
County: McIntosh Frequent Mental Distress
19.1%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: McIntosh Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
5.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Mental Health Provider Rate
County: McIntosh Mental Health Provider Rate
170
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(426)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(161)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: McIntosh Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
17.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: McIntosh Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
6.1
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Health / Mortality Data
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Life Expectancy
County: McIntosh Life Expectancy
72.5
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(74.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Premature Death
County: McIntosh Premature Death
12,658.0
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10,334.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
County: McIntosh Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
48.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
County: McIntosh Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
73.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
County: McIntosh Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
33.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(35.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
32.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
39.8%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Disability
45.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
25.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
8.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
13.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
28.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: McIntosh Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
18.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: McIntosh Adults who Visited a Dentist
39.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(42.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Dentist Rate
County: McIntosh Dentist Rate
51
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(52)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: McIntosh Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
11.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with Arthritis
County: McIntosh Adults with Arthritis
36.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults with Kidney Disease
County: McIntosh Adults with Kidney Disease
4.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
15.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
8.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(37.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
22.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: McIntosh Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
6.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: McIntosh Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
57.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
7.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
107.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(64.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
6.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults with COPD
County: McIntosh Adults with COPD
11.9%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults with Current Asthma
County: McIntosh Adults with Current Asthma
11.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
County: McIntosh Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
70.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(60.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: McIntosh Asthma: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh Asthma: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh COPD: Medicare Population
County: McIntosh COPD: Medicare Population
17.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Chlamydia Incidence Rate
462.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(519.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(464.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
171.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(257.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(188.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh HIV Prevalence Rate
County: McIntosh HIV Prevalence Rate
175.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Value
(210.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(165.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: McIntosh Syphilis Incidence Rate
15.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: McIntosh Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: McIntosh Adults who Smoke
County: McIntosh Adults who Smoke
20.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: McIntosh Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: McIntosh Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
5.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: McIntosh Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: McIntosh Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
3.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: McIntosh Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
26.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: McIntosh Adults Happy with Weight
County: McIntosh Adults Happy with Weight
43.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
Health / Wellness & Lifestyle
County: McIntosh
Value
Compared to:
County: McIntosh Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks
County: McIntosh Adults who Agree Vaccine Benefits Outweigh Possible Risks
60.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(65.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(70.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: McIntosh Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
County: McIntosh Adults with Medical Conditions Limiting Lifestyle
40.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(34.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
