Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard
In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.
Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.
Search Results:
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults who Binge Drink
County: Sequoyah Adults who Binge Drink
12.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Drink Excessively
County: Sequoyah Adults who Drink Excessively
13.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
County: Sequoyah Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning
29.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services
1.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Cancer
Health / Cancer
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults with Cancer
County: Sequoyah Adults with Cancer
7.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer
26.3
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 39 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(25.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer
209.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(175.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(198.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer
20.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 51 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer
60.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(57.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer
24.6
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
County: Sequoyah All Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah All Cancer Incidence Rate
496.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(443.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(503.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Breast Cancer Incidence Rate
119.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(125.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Cancer: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Cancer: Medicare Population
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate
21.4
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(18.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
County: Sequoyah Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65
77.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Colon Cancer Screening
County: Sequoyah Colon Cancer Screening
52.9%
(2018)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
County: Sequoyah Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation
61.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate
46.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(39.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Cancer Medical Services
8.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate
86.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(87.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
County: Sequoyah Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74
62.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)
County: Sequoyah Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Mammography Screening: Medicare Population
41.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate
14.1
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 41 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate
81.3
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(100.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(85.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / County Health Rankings
Health / County Health Rankings
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Clinical Care Ranking
County: Sequoyah Clinical Care Ranking
59
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Sequoyah Health Behaviors Ranking
County: Sequoyah Health Behaviors Ranking
67
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Sequoyah Morbidity Ranking
County: Sequoyah Morbidity Ranking
70
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Sequoyah Mortality Ranking
County: Sequoyah Mortality Ranking
51
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Sequoyah Physical Environment Ranking
County: Sequoyah Physical Environment Ranking
65
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
County: Sequoyah Social and Economic Factors Ranking
County: Sequoyah Social and Economic Factors Ranking
58
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Health / Diabetes
Health / Diabetes
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ with Diabetes
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ with Diabetes
10.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(11.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes
13.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes
32.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(31.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah Diabetes: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Diabetes: Medicare Population
27.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Disabilities
Health / Disabilities
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
County: Sequoyah Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
31.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Children with a Disability
County: Sequoyah Children with a Disability
7.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty
10.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Disability
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Disability
23.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Hearing Difficulty
7.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty
5.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Vision Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Persons with a Vision Difficulty
3.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty
14.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Family Planning
Health / Family Planning
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
County: Sequoyah Teen Birth Rate: 15-19
32.8
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Prior Value
(38.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
Health / Health Care Access & Quality
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
County: Sequoyah Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups
69.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
County: Sequoyah Adults who have had a Routine Checkup
74.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
County: Sequoyah Adults with Health Insurance: 18+
77.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(89.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
County: Sequoyah Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64
75.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(79.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(72.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with HMO Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Adults with HMO Health Insurance
8.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance
17.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Adults with Medicare Health Insurance
25.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with PPO Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Adults with PPO Health Insurance
25.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults without Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Adults without Health Insurance
14.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Children with Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Children with Health Insurance
92.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(90.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services
14.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room
29.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(28.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(30.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Sequoyah Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate
50
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(122)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(51)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with Health Insurance
County: Sequoyah Persons with Health Insurance
80.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(77.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sequoyah Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population
4,159.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2,983.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3,737.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Primary Care Provider Rate
County: Sequoyah Primary Care Provider Rate
35
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(59)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(31)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Health Information Technology
Health / Health Information Technology
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
25.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(29.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Internet Access
County: Sequoyah Adults with Internet Access
81.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households with a Computer
County: Sequoyah Households with a Computer
79.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(79.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households with a Smartphone
County: Sequoyah Households with a Smartphone
76.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(74.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households with an Internet Subscription
County: Sequoyah Households with an Internet Subscription
77.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(85.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
County: Sequoyah Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
88.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Persons with an Internet Subscription
County: Sequoyah Persons with an Internet Subscription
83.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
Health / Heart Disease & Stroke
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol
20.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure
31.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(31.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Experienced a Stroke
County: Sequoyah Adults who Experienced a Stroke
4.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
County: Sequoyah Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease
9.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
County: Sequoyah Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure
78.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist
14.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)
49.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack
120.5
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(39.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(120.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease
309.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(246.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
County: Sequoyah Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Cholesterol Test History
County: Sequoyah Cholesterol Test History
80.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Heart Failure: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Heart Failure: Medicare Population
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah High Blood Pressure Prevalence
County: Sequoyah High Blood Pressure Prevalence
44.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)
County: Sequoyah High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
County: Sequoyah High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years
40.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population
62.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(60.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Hypertension: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Hypertension: Medicare Population
72.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(72.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Stroke: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Stroke: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia
15.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
County: Sequoyah COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate
0.0
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(Dec 2, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate
4.03
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(11.67)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.05)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population
42.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Babies with Low Birthweight
County: Sequoyah Babies with Low Birthweight
8.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Babies with Very Low Birthweight
County: Sequoyah Babies with Very Low Birthweight
1.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Infant Mortality Rate
County: Sequoyah Infant Mortality Rate
5.3
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(7.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sequoyah Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
County: Sequoyah Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care
66.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(67.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
County: Sequoyah Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy
14.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)
County: Sequoyah Preterm Births
County: Sequoyah Preterm Births
9.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
Health / Medications & Prescriptions
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
County: Sequoyah Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression
16.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
County: Sequoyah Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression
25.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide
14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(21.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sequoyah Depression: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Depression: Medicare Population
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(20.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Frequent Mental Distress
County: Sequoyah Frequent Mental Distress
19.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
County: Sequoyah Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services
7.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Mental Health Provider Rate
County: Sequoyah Mental Health Provider Rate
305
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(426)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(299)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
County: Sequoyah Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days
19.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
County: Sequoyah Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days
6.3
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Mortality Data
Health / Mortality Data
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Life Expectancy
County: Sequoyah Life Expectancy
71.6
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(74.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Premature Death
County: Sequoyah Premature Death
13,491.4
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10,334.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
County: Sequoyah Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days
49.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
County: Sequoyah Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home
74.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(62.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days
36.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(38.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Older Adults
Health / Older Adults
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females
33.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males
40.1%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Disability
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Disability
53.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty
25.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty
11.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty
8.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty
22.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease
50.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Oral Health
Health / Oral Health
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
County: Sequoyah Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss
19.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Visited a Dentist
County: Sequoyah Adults who Visited a Dentist
39.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(41.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Dentist Rate
County: Sequoyah Dentist Rate
40
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(64)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Prior Value
(38)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Other Conditions
Health / Other Conditions
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist
10.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Arthritis
County: Sequoyah Adults with Arthritis
30.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Kidney Disease
County: Sequoyah Adults with Kidney Disease
4.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease
12.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population
23.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Osteoporosis: Medicare Population
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population
34.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(34.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Physical Activity
Health / Physical Activity
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ who are Sedentary
27.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(31.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym
7.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
County: Sequoyah Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine
58.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(40.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Health / Prevention & Safety
Health / Prevention & Safety
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls
7.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms
16.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,080 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(17.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(17.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries
76.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(64.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
Health / Respiratory Diseases
Health / Respiratory Diseases
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma
7.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults with COPD
County: Sequoyah Adults with COPD
11.3%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults with Current Asthma
County: Sequoyah Adults with Current Asthma
12.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
County: Sequoyah Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases
70.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(60.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
County: Sequoyah Asthma: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah Asthma: Medicare Population
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah COPD: Medicare Population
County: Sequoyah COPD: Medicare Population
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Chlamydia Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Chlamydia Incidence Rate
427.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(519.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(440.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Gonorrhea Incidence Rate
134.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(257.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(146.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah HIV Prevalence Rate
County: Sequoyah HIV Prevalence Rate
146.5
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Value
(210.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(141.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Syphilis Incidence Rate
County: Sequoyah Syphilis Incidence Rate
12.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(30.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Tobacco Use
Health / Tobacco Use
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking
1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Sequoyah Adults who Smoke
County: Sequoyah Adults who Smoke
22.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(23.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days
6.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
County: Sequoyah Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days
3.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OK Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Health / Weight Status
Health / Weight Status
County: Sequoyah
Value
Compared to:
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
County: Sequoyah Adults 20+ Who Are Obese
33.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Prior Value
(28.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
County: Sequoyah Adults Happy with Weight
County: Sequoyah Adults Happy with Weight
43.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
OK Value
(46.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
US Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(43.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
