Skip to main content

Advanced Search: Build a Custom Dashboard

In the fields below, search for indicators by location, topics, population, classification, subgroup, or comparison. No fields are required, but we suggest selecting a location or two to start. In the additional search options section, select options to group and order search results. To learn more about how to customize a dashboard, see our help center.

Visit the Indicator List Page to see the full list of indicators and locations available on the site.

  • Map View
  • All Census Places
  • All Census Tracts
  • All Counties
  • All Zip Codes
  • County : Adair Census Tracts
  • County : Adair Zip Codes
  • County : Cherokee Census Tracts
  • County : Cherokee Zip Codes
  • County : Craig Census Tracts
  • County : Craig Zip Codes
  • County : Delaware Census Tracts
  • County : Delaware Zip Codes
  • County : Mayes Census Tracts
  • County : Mayes Zip Codes
  • County : McIntosh Census Tracts
  • County : McIntosh Zip Codes
  • County : Muskogee Census Tracts
  • County : Muskogee Zip Codes
  • County : Nowata Census Tracts
  • County : Nowata Zip Codes
  • County : Ottawa Census Tracts
  • County : Ottawa Zip Codes
  • County : Rogers Census Tracts
  • County : Rogers Zip Codes
  • County : Sequoyah Census Tracts
  • County : Sequoyah Zip Codes
  • County : Tulsa Census Tracts
  • County : Tulsa Zip Codes
  • County : Wagoner Census Tracts
  • County : Wagoner Zip Codes
  • County : Washington Census Tracts
  • County : Washington Zip Codes
  • All Health Topics
  • All Community Topics
  • All Economy Topics
  • All Education Topics
  • All Environmental Health Topics
Search display options:

Search Results:

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Alcohol & Drug Use

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults who Binge Drink

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults who Binge Drink

14.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Rogers has a value of 14.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults who Drink Excessively

Current Value:
15.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (13.8%), Rogers has a value of 15.3% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(13.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Rogers has a value of 15.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (15.3%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.1%).
Prior Value
(15.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Death Rate due to Drug Poisoning

Current Value:
12.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 43 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,899 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (19.9), Rogers has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (27.2), Rogers has a value of 12.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(27.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(20.7)
<div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rogers Households that Received Substance Abuse Medical Services

1.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (1.4%), Rogers has a value of 1.2%.
OK Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.3%), Rogers has a value of 1.2%.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (1.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (1.3%).
Prior Value
(1.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

Health / Cancer

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Cancer

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults with Cancer

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults with Cancer

7.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rogers has a value of 7.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Breast Cancer

Current Value:
27.4
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 27.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.3.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 39 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 27.4 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 23.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,755 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (22.4), Rogers has a value of 27.4 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(22.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (19.6), Rogers has a value of 27.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (27.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (25.7).
Prior Value
(25.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
173.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 173.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 182.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 196.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 173.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (175.2), Rogers has a value of 173.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(175.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Rogers has a value of 173.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (173.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (171.0).
Prior Value
(171.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Colorectal Cancer

Current Value:
14.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 51 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,174 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.3), Rogers has a value of 14.8 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(16.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.1), Rogers has a value of 14.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (14.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.5).
Prior Value
(15.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
43.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 43.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 50.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 57.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 43.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (46.5), Rogers has a value of 43.3 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(46.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Rogers has a value of 43.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (43.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (43.7).
Prior Value
(43.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Prostate Cancer

Current Value:
24.3
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 24.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,576 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (20.0), Rogers has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(20.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.8), Rogers has a value of 24.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (24.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.6).
Prior Value
(23.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)

County: Rogers All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers All Cancer Incidence Rate

464.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 464.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 439.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 469.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 464.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (443.4), Rogers has a value of 464.4 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(443.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Rogers has a value of 464.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (464.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (468.3).
Prior Value
(468.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Breast Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
142.3
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 142.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 116.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 126.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 142.3 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 122.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 133.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,478 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (122.6), Rogers has a value of 142.3 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(122.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (127.0), Rogers has a value of 142.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(127.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (142.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (141.8).
Prior Value
(141.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (10.0%), Rogers has a value of 10.0%.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Rogers has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (10.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.0%).
Prior Value
(10.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.1
Cases per 100,000 females
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 11.1 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 696 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (9.8), Rogers has a value of 11.1 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.5), Rogers has a value of 11.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(7.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (11.1) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.1).
Prior Value
(9.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Cervical Cancer Screening: 21-65

Current Value:
80.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 80.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 80.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (82.8%), Rogers has a value of 80.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(82.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Colon Cancer Screening

Current Value:

County: Rogers Colon Cancer Screening

60.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 60.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 57.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 56.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 60.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 61.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (66.4%), Rogers has a value of 60.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(66.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Colon Cancer Screening: USPSTF Recommendation

Current Value:
65.4%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 65.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 65.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (72.4%), Rogers has a value of 65.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(72.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
36.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 36.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.2.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 69 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 36.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (39.7), Rogers has a value of 36.9 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(39.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Rogers has a value of 36.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (36.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (39.9).
Prior Value
(39.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households that Received Cancer Medical Services

Current Value:
8.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.1%), Rogers has a value of 8.4%.
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Rogers has a value of 8.4%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (8.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (9.1%).
Prior Value
(9.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
68.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 68.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 66.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 79.9.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 68.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (63.2), Rogers has a value of 68.0 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(63.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Rogers has a value of 68.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (68.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (70.6).
Prior Value
(70.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Mammogram in Past 2 Years: 50-74

Current Value:
68.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 68.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 65.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 63.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 68.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rogers has a value of 68.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.3%)

County: Rogers Mammography Screening: Medicare Population

Current Value:
43.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 43.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 34.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 43.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 40.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,123 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (43.0%), Rogers has a value of 43.0%.
OK Value
(43.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (47.0%), Rogers has a value of 43.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (43.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (45.0%).
Prior Value
(45.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Oral Cavity and Pharynx Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
15.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.7.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 41 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.8 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,706 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (13.0), Rogers has a value of 15.8 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(13.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9), Rogers has a value of 15.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (15.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.1).
Prior Value
(15.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Prostate Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
98.8
Cases per 100,000 males
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 98.8 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 92.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 102.2.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 70 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 98.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 107.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 125.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,500 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (100.5), Rogers has a value of 98.8 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(100.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (110.5), Rogers has a value of 98.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(110.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (98.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (102.0).
Prior Value
(102.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / County Health Rankings

Health / County Health Rankings

Health / County Health Rankings

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / County Health Rankings

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Clinical Care Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rogers Clinical Care Ranking

10
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 10 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

County: Rogers Health Behaviors Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rogers Health Behaviors Ranking

3
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

County: Rogers Morbidity Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rogers Morbidity Ranking

8
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

County: Rogers Mortality Ranking

Current Value:

County: Rogers Mortality Ranking

1
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 1 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

County: Rogers Physical Environment Ranking

Current Value:
64
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 64 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

County: Rogers Social and Economic Factors Ranking

Current Value:
4
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 58.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

Health / Diabetes

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Diabetes

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults 20+ with Diabetes

8.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 8.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 8.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (8.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults Who Bought Medications for Diabetes

Current Value:
11.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (11.7%), Rogers has a value of 11.9%.
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.7%), Rogers has a value of 11.9%.
US Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (11.9%) is greater  than the previously measured value (11.8%).
Prior Value
(11.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:
19.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 19.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (31.9), Rogers has a value of 19.7 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(31.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8), Rogers has a value of 19.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 26.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 26.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (27.0%), Rogers has a value of 26.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(27.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Rogers has a value of 26.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

Health / Disabilities

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Disabilities

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults with Disability Living in Poverty

Current Value:
18.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 27.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (25.5%), Rogers has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(25.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.9%), Rogers has a value of 18.4% which is lower and better.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Children with a Disability

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (5.4%), Rogers has a value of 5.1%.
OK Value
(5.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Rogers has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
6.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (6.5%), Rogers has a value of 6.9%.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Rogers has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Rogers Persons with a Disability

16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (16.6%), Rogers has a value of 16.6%.
OK Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Rogers has a value of 16.6%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
5.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (5.2%), Rogers has a value of 5.3%.
OK Value
(5.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Rogers has a value of 5.3%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
2.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (2.8%), Rogers has a value of 2.2%.
OK Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Rogers has a value of 2.2%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (3.5%), Rogers has a value of 2.6%.
OK Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rogers has a value of 2.6%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
8.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.8%), Rogers has a value of 8.9%.
OK Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Rogers has a value of 8.9%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

Health / Family Planning

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Family Planning

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

Current Value:

County: Rogers Teen Birth Rate: 15-19

20.2
Live births per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 20.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.5.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (21.2), Rogers has a value of 20.2 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(21.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Rogers has a value of 20.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (20.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.2).
Prior Value
(14.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults who go to the Doctor Regularly for Checkups

73.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 73.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 70.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 68.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (71.6%), Rogers has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(71.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (74.2%), Rogers has a value of 73.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(74.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (73.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (70.6%).
Prior Value
(70.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Adults who have had a Routine Checkup

Current Value:
74.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 74.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 74.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 74.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (73.6%), Rogers has a value of 74.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(73.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults with Health Insurance: 18+

Current Value:
84.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 84.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 84.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (82.6%), Rogers has a value of 84.2% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(82.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (85.9%), Rogers has a value of 84.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(85.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (84.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (91.7%).
Prior Value
(91.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
82.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 82.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 77.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 82.2% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (79.4%), Rogers has a value of 82.2% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(79.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (82.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (83.6%).
Prior Value
(83.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with HMO Health Insurance

Current Value:
10.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (11.7%), Rogers has a value of 10.6%.
OK Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.2%), Rogers has a value of 10.6%.
US Value
(14.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (10.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (10.7%).
Prior Value
(10.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Adults with Medicaid Health Insurance

Current Value:
11.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (14.3%), Rogers has a value of 11.1%.
OK Value
(14.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.9%), Rogers has a value of 11.1%.
US Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (11.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with Medicare Health Insurance

Current Value:
19.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (19.4%), Rogers has a value of 19.4%.
OK Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.6%), Rogers has a value of 19.4%.
US Value
(18.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (19.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (22.0%).
Prior Value
(22.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with PPO Health Insurance

Current Value:
33.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (31.6%), Rogers has a value of 33.4%.
OK Value
(31.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.9%), Rogers has a value of 33.4%.
US Value
(33.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (33.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.7%).
Prior Value
(33.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults without Health Insurance

Current Value:
10.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (10.8%), Rogers has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Children with Health Insurance

Current Value:
92.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 92.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 89.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 92.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (92.0%), Rogers has a value of 92.0%.
OK Value
(92.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (92.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.8%).
Prior Value
(91.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households that Received Cardiology Medical Services

13.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (12.3%), Rogers has a value of 13.1%.
OK Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.8%), Rogers has a value of 13.1%.
US Value
(11.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (13.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.4%).
Prior Value
(13.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households that Received Medical Services in an Emergency Room

29.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (28.9%), Rogers has a value of 29.6%.
OK Value
(28.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (28.0%), Rogers has a value of 29.6%.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (29.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (30.4%).
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Non-Physician Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
60
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 60 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 60 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 65.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (122), Rogers has a value of 60 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(122)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (60) is greater and better than the previously measured value (57).
Prior Value
(57)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
85.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 85.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 81.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 85.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (83.1%), Rogers has a value of 85.0% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(83.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (85.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (86.0%).
Prior Value
(86.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rogers Persons with Private Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
54.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (48.7%), Rogers has a value of 54.8%.
OK Value
(48.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.8%), Rogers has a value of 54.8%.
US Value
(54.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (54.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (53.4%).
Prior Value
(53.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with Public Health Insurance Only

Current Value:
20.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (26.6%), Rogers has a value of 20.8%.
OK Value
(26.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.8%), Rogers has a value of 20.8%.
US Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (20.8%) is greater  than the previously measured value (19.3%).
Prior Value
(19.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
2,838.0
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 2,838.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,910.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4,075.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 2,838.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,374.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2,983.0), Rogers has a value of 2,838.0 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(2,983.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677.0), Rogers has a value of 2,838.0 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2,677.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (2,838.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (3,415.0).
Prior Value
(3,415.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Primary Care Provider Rate

Current Value:
37
Providers per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 37 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 37 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 37 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 47 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 29.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,984 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (59), Rogers has a value of 37 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(59)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (37) is less and worse than the previously measured value (39).
Prior Value
(39)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Health Information Technology

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Who Access Medical Services and Information through the Internet

29.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (29.4%), Rogers has a value of 29.6%.
OK Value
(29.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Rogers has a value of 29.6%.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (29.6%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.0%).
Prior Value
(33.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Adults with Internet Access

Current Value:
89.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 89.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 85.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (89.0%), Rogers has a value of 89.5% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(89.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.7%), Rogers has a value of 89.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (89.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (95.1%).
Prior Value
(95.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households with a Computer

Current Value:
87.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 87.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (86.0%), Rogers has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(86.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.2%), Rogers has a value of 87.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (87.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (86.3%).
Prior Value
(86.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households with a Smartphone

Current Value:
83.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 78.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 83.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 76.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (82.7%), Rogers has a value of 83.7% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(82.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (84.7%), Rogers has a value of 83.7% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (83.7%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (82.2%).
Prior Value
(82.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
87.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 87.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 75.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 87.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 83.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (85.8%), Rogers has a value of 87.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(85.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (88.5%), Rogers has a value of 87.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices

95.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 95.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 90.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 95.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 88.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (93.1%), Rogers has a value of 95.7% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (94.0%), Rogers has a value of 95.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
89.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 80.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 89.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (88.7%), Rogers has a value of 89.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(88.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Rogers has a value of 89.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Who Bought Medications for Cholesterol

Current Value:
18.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (17.4%), Rogers has a value of 18.5%.
OK Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.1%), Rogers has a value of 18.5%.
US Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (18.5%) is greater  than the previously measured value (18.3%).
Prior Value
(18.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults Who Bought Medications for High Blood Pressure

28.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (26.2%), Rogers has a value of 28.1%.
OK Value
(26.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.4%), Rogers has a value of 28.1%.
US Value
(24.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (28.1%) is greater  than the previously measured value (27.9%).
Prior Value
(27.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults who Experienced a Stroke

Current Value:
3.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.3%), Rogers has a value of 3.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults who Experienced Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
6.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 6.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.1%), Rogers has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults who Have Taken Medications for High Blood Pressure

77.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 77.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 77.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 77.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 80.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 78.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (78.2%), Rogers has a value of 77.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults Who Visited a Cardiologist

Current Value:
13.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (13.1%), Rogers has a value of 13.4%.
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.2%), Rogers has a value of 13.4%.
US Value
(13.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (13.4%) is less  than the previously measured value (13.9%).
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

28.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 28.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.5.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 72 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (40.6), Rogers has a value of 28.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (38.8), Rogers has a value of 28.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(38.8 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Attack

Current Value:
26.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 26.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 57.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.3.
OK Counties
(2016)
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (39.4), Rogers has a value of 26.0 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(39.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (26.0) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (23.4).
Prior Value
(23.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Heart Disease

Current Value:
240.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 240.7 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 252.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 290.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (246.2), Rogers has a value of 240.7 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(246.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.

County: Rogers Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (15.0%), Rogers has a value of 15.0%.
OK Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Rogers has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (15.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Cholesterol Test History

Current Value:

County: Rogers Cholesterol Test History

84.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 82.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 81.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 84.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (86.4%), Rogers has a value of 84.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(86.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (13.0%), Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers High Blood Pressure Prevalence

Current Value:
37.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 37.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 41.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 37.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 41.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (32.7%), Rogers has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (41.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(41.9%)

County: Rogers High Cholesterol Prevalence: Past 5 Years

Current Value:
34.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 34.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (36.4%), Rogers has a value of 34.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
58.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 58.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (62.0%), Rogers has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rogers has a value of 58.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (58.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.0%).
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 69.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 71.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 73.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 69.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (70.0%), Rogers has a value of 69.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(70.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Rogers has a value of 69.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (69.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (70.0%).
Prior Value
(70.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 24.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (25.0%), Rogers has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Rogers has a value of 24.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.0%), Rogers has a value of 5.0%.
OK Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rogers has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

14.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 59 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (13.2), Rogers has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(13.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.0), Rogers has a value of 14.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.0 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers COVID-19 Daily Average Case-Fatality Rate

Current Value:
3.9
Deaths per 100 cases
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.1.
OK Counties
(Dec 2, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 0.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.3.
U.S. Counties
(Mar 25, 2022)
The distribution is based on data from 2,811 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (1.1), Rogers has a value of 3.9 which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(1.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7), Rogers has a value of 3.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (3.9) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (1.2).
Prior Value
(1.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers COVID-19 Daily Average Incidence Rate

Current Value:
11.25
Cases per 100,000 population
(Mar 3, 2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 11.25 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.25 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.73.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 11.25 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.84 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.01.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (11.67), Rogers has a value of 11.25 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(11.67)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.97), Rogers has a value of 11.25 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.97)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (11.25) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.83).
Prior Value
(11.83)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
41.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 41.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 41.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (44.0%), Rogers has a value of 41.0% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(44.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Rogers has a value of 41.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (41.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (8.0%), Rogers has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Rogers has a value of 6.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (6.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (4.0%).
Prior Value
(4.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 9.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (8.5%), Rogers has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.5%), Rogers has a value of 9.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (9.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.7%).
Prior Value
(8.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:
1.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (1.5%), Rogers has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Rogers has a value of 1.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (1.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.4%).
Prior Value
(2.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers Infant Mortality Rate

3.6
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.1.
OK Counties
(2017-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 42 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (6.6), Rogers has a value of 3.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Rogers has a value of 3.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (3.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.9).
Prior Value
(5.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.0)
<div>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rogers Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
73.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 73.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 72.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (71.3%), Rogers has a value of 73.9% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(71.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.3%), Rogers has a value of 73.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (73.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (75.6%).
Prior Value
(75.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Mothers who Smoked During Pregnancy

Current Value:
5.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.6%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 67 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (6.6%), Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.6%), Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.6% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (5.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.6%).
Prior Value
(6.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(4.3%)

County: Rogers Preterm Births

Current Value:

County: Rogers Preterm Births

12.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (11.4%), Rogers has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Rogers has a value of 12.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (12.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (12.2%).
Prior Value
(12.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Medications & Prescriptions

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults who Bought Medications for Anxiety or Depression

16.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (16.0%), Rogers has a value of 16.2%.
OK Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.9%), Rogers has a value of 16.2%.
US Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (16.2%) is less  than the previously measured value (16.4%).
Prior Value
(16.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Ever Diagnosed with Depression

Current Value:
23.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 23.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 23.7% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 22.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (19.5%), Rogers has a value of 23.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(19.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:
17.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 17.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 66 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (21.5), Rogers has a value of 17.8 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(21.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.5), Rogers has a value of 17.8 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(13.5 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rogers Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (18.0%), Rogers has a value of 18.0%.
OK Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (18.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (19.0%).
Prior Value
(19.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Frequent Mental Distress

Current Value:

County: Rogers Frequent Mental Distress

15.5%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 15.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,121 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (16.1%), Rogers has a value of 15.5% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(16.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Rogers has a value of 15.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (15.5%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Households that Received Mental Healthcare Services

7.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.5%), Rogers has a value of 7.4%.
OK Value
(8.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Rogers has a value of 7.4%.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (7.4%) is greater  than the previously measured value (7.1%).
Prior Value
(7.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Mental Health Provider Rate

Current Value:
265
Providers per 100,000 population
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 265 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 265 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 143.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 265 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 137 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 62.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,956 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (426), Rogers has a value of 265 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(426)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (265) is greater and better than the previously measured value (263).
Prior Value
(263)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Poor Mental Health: 14+ Days

Current Value:
17.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 17.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 17.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (14.7%), Rogers has a value of 17.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Poor Mental Health: Average Number of Days

Current Value:
5.4
Days
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (5.5), Rogers has a value of 5.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(5.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.8), Rogers has a value of 5.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(4.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (5.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (4.8).
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

Health / Mortality Data

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Mortality Data

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Life Expectancy

Current Value:

County: Rogers Life Expectancy

76.9
Years
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 76.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 73.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 72.1.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 76.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.8 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,070 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (74.4), Rogers has a value of 76.9 which is higher and better.
OK Value
(74.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.6), Rogers has a value of 76.9 which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Premature Death

Current Value:

County: Rogers Premature Death

7,247.6
Years per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 7,247.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11,395.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13,393.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 75 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 7,247.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9,469.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11,769.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,886 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (10,334.0), Rogers has a value of 7,247.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(10,334.0)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7,971.5), Rogers has a value of 7,247.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(7,971.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Nutrition & Healthy Eating

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults who Drank Soft Drinks: Past 7 Days

Current Value:
45.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 45.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 48.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.3%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (46.8%), Rogers has a value of 45.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(46.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Rogers has a value of 45.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults who Frequently Cook Meals at Home

Current Value:
77.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 77.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 73.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (76.4%), Rogers has a value of 77.3% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(76.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (78.0%), Rogers has a value of 77.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(78.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (77.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (69.7%).
Prior Value
(69.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Adults Who Frequently Used Quick Service Restaurants: Past 30 Days

39.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 39.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 37.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 39.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (40.8%), Rogers has a value of 39.1% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(40.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (40.4%), Rogers has a value of 39.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(40.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (39.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.5%).
Prior Value
(39.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

Health / Older Adults

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Older Adults

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Females

40.2%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 40.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 33.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 31.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 40.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 36.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (37.9%), Rogers has a value of 40.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ who Received Recommended Preventive Services: Males

40.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 40.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 40.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.2%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 40.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (43.7%), Rogers has a value of 40.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
39.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (41.0%), Rogers has a value of 39.9%.
OK Value
(41.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Rogers has a value of 39.9%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
19.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (18.9%), Rogers has a value of 19.3%.
OK Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rogers has a value of 19.3%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
6.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (7.6%), Rogers has a value of 6.3%.
OK Value
(7.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Rogers has a value of 6.3%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (8.1%), Rogers has a value of 6.2%.
OK Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rogers has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
13.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (14.4%), Rogers has a value of 13.5%.
OK Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rogers has a value of 13.5%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

36.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 36.2 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 43.8.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 71 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (37.4), Rogers has a value of 36.2 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(37.4)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Rogers has a value of 36.2 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(32.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (7.0%), Rogers has a value of 7.0%.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rogers has a value of 7.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

Health / Oral Health

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Oral Health

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults 65+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
12.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (13.4%), Rogers has a value of 12.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
48.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 48.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 42.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 39.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 48.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 45.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 42.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (46.5%), Rogers has a value of 48.8% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.2%), Rogers has a value of 48.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(51.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (48.8%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (49.0%).
Prior Value
(49.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Dentist Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers Dentist Rate

45
Dentists per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 45 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 74 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 45 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 27.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,054 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (64), Rogers has a value of 45 which is lower and worse.
OK Value
(64)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (45) is less and worse than the previously measured value (47).
Prior Value
(47)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

Health / Other Conditions

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Other Conditions

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Who Visited a Dermatologist

Current Value:
14.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (13.4%), Rogers has a value of 14.0%.
OK Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.9%), Rogers has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(15.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (14.0%) is greater  than the previously measured value (13.8%).
Prior Value
(13.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with Arthritis

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults with Arthritis

28.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 31.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 28.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (25.2%), Rogers has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (3.1%), Rogers has a value of 3.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(3.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Kidney Disease

Current Value:
9.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 9.6 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 63 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (11.3), Rogers has a value of 9.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(11.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.7), Rogers has a value of 9.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.7 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
18.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (19.0%), Rogers has a value of 18.0% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Rogers has a value of 18.0%.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (18.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
12.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (10.0%), Rogers has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rogers has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (12.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.0%).
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

38.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 38.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 38.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 38.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (38.0%), Rogers has a value of 38.0%.
OK Value
(38.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Rogers has a value of 38.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (38.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (38.0%).
Prior Value
(38.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

Health / Physical Activity

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Physical Activity

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
22.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 22.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.8%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 22.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (22.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.3%).
Prior Value
(24.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults Who Belong to a Fitness Club or Gym

Current Value:
11.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (13.1%), Rogers has a value of 11.7%.
OK Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Rogers has a value of 11.7%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (11.7%) is less  than the previously measured value (12.4%).
Prior Value
(12.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

County: Rogers Adults who Follow a Regular Exercise Routine

Current Value:
63.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 63.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 59.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 57.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (63.3%), Rogers has a value of 63.8% which is higher and better.
OK Value
(63.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (67.2%), Rogers has a value of 63.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(67.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (63.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (50.0%).
Prior Value
(50.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Prevention & Safety

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:
11.5
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 11.5 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 65 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (16.6), Rogers has a value of 11.5 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(16.6)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.3), Rogers has a value of 11.5 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.3 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Firearms

Current Value:
10.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,083 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (18.3), Rogers has a value of 10.9 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(18.3)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0), Rogers has a value of 10.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (10.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.5).
Prior Value
(10.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.7)

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

44.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 44.9 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 72.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 83.0.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 76 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (64.7), Rogers has a value of 44.9 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(64.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (57.6), Rogers has a value of 44.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(57.6 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Respiratory Diseases

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Who Bought Medications for Asthma

Current Value:
6.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (7.0%), Rogers has a value of 6.9%.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Rogers has a value of 6.9%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (6.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.9%).
Prior Value
(6.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults with COPD

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults with COPD

7.5%
Percent of adults
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (6.4%), Rogers has a value of 7.5% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults with Current Asthma

Current Value:
10.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.9%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 10.9% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Rogers has a value of 10.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Chronic Lower Respiratory Diseases

56.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 56.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 78.5.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (60.9), Rogers has a value of 56.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(60.9)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.4), Rogers has a value of 56.4 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(36.4 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

County: Rogers Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 7.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (7.0%), Rogers has a value of 7.0%.
OK Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Rogers has a value of 7.0%.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (7.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.0%).
Prior Value
(7.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Rogers COPD: Medicare Population

14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.5%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (14.0%), Rogers has a value of 14.0%.
OK Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Rogers has a value of 14.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (14.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.0%).
Prior Value
(14.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers Chlamydia Incidence Rate

315.4
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 315.4 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 410.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 525.4.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 315.4 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 295.3 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 468.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,800 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (519.5), Rogers has a value of 315.4 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(519.5)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.5), Rogers has a value of 315.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (315.4) is less and better than the previously measured value (318.0).
Prior Value
(318.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

101.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 101.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 164.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 239.3.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 101.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 97.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 199.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,117 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (257.7), Rogers has a value of 101.3 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(257.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (214.0), Rogers has a value of 101.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(214.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (101.3) is less and better than the previously measured value (125.5).
Prior Value
(125.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers HIV Prevalence Rate

96.2
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (210.2), Rogers has a value of 96.2.
OK Value
(210.2)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (382.2), Rogers has a value of 96.2.
US Value
(382.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (96.2) is greater  than the previously measured value (96.1).
Prior Value
(96.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Rogers Syphilis Incidence Rate

19.6
Cases per 100,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 19.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 29.6.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to the OK Value (30.7), Rogers has a value of 19.6 which is lower and better.
OK Value
(30.7)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.2), Rogers has a value of 19.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (19.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.8).
Prior Value
(10.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

Health / Tobacco Use

County: Rogers

Value
Compared to:

County: Rogers Adults Who Bought Medications to Quit Smoking

Current Value:
1.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the OK Value (1.5%), Rogers has a value of 1.4%.
OK Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Rogers has a value of 1.4%.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (1.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.4%).
Prior Value
(1.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

County: Rogers Adults who Smoke

Current Value:

County: Rogers Adults who Smoke

17.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 17.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (18.7%), Rogers has a value of 17.9% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(18.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (15.5%), Rogers has a value of 17.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(15.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (17.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (18.0%).
Prior Value
(18.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>

County: Rogers Adults Who Used Electronic Cigarettes: Past 30 Days

5.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.7%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (6.5%), Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
OK Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.9%), Rogers has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.

County: Rogers Adults Who Used Smokeless Tobacco: Past 30 Days

Current Value:
3.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to OK Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.4%.
OK Counties
The distribution is based on data from 77 Oklahoma counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rogers has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the OK Value (2.3%), Rogers has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
OK Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oklahoma State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.7%), Rogers has a value of 3.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rogers (3.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rogers value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.