CDC COMMUNITY GUIDE: Preventing Excessive Alcohol Consumption: Increasing Alcohol Taxes
CDC
An Evidence-Based Practice
Description
Alcohol excise taxes affect the price of alcohol, and are intended to reduce alcohol-related harms, raise revenue, or both. Alcohol taxes are implemented at the state and federal level, and are beverage-specific (i.e., they differ for beer, wine and spirits). These taxes are usually based on the amount of beverage purchased (not on the sales price), so their effects can erode over time due to inflation if they are not adjusted regularly.
The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends increasing the unit price of alcohol by raising taxes based on strong evidence of effectiveness for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Public health effects are expected to be proportional to the size of the tax increase.
The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends increasing the unit price of alcohol by raising taxes based on strong evidence of effectiveness for reducing excessive alcohol consumption and related harms. Public health effects are expected to be proportional to the size of the tax increase.
Impact
The Community Preventive Services Task Force (CPSTF) has found that increasing the unit price of alcohol by raising taxes can help prevent excessive alcohol consumption and related harms.
Results / Accomplishments
Results from the Systematic Reviews:
Seventy-three studies qualified for the review.
The studies looked at the relationship between either tax rates or total price on measures related to excessive alcohol consumption or its related harms.
The effects of prices on consumption or other outcomes are often expressed as "elasticities," that are defined as the expected percentage change in the outcome when the price increases by 1%. For example, an alcohol price elasticity of -0.50 would mean that the outcome of interest (e.g., alcohol consumption) would be expected to decrease by 5% for every 10% increase in price.
Alcohol price and per capita consumption:
• Price elasticity of alcohol consumption (i.e., the expected percentage change in alcohol consumption when the price increases by 1%)
-Beer consumption: -0.50 (interquartile interval [IQI]: -0.91 to -0.36; 18 studies)
-Wine consumption: -0.64 (IQI: -1.03 to -0.38; 22 studies)
-Spirits consumption: -0.79 (IQI: -0.90 to -0.24; 21 studies)
-Total alcohol (ethanol) consumption: -0.77 (IQI: -2.00 to -0.50; 11 studies)
• Price and consumption by high school or college age youth
-Six studies found consistent evidence that higher alcohol prices were associated with less youth drinking; 3 studies found mixed results (9 studies).
Alcohol price and alcohol-related harms:
• Higher alcohol prices or taxes were consistently related to:
-Fewer motor vehicle crashes and fatalities (10 of 11 studies)
-Less alcohol-impaired driving (3 of 3 studies)
-Less mortality from liver cirrhosis (5 of 5 studies)
-Less all-cause mortality (1 study)
• Effects also were demonstrated for measures of violence (3 studies), sexually transmitted diseases (1 study), and alcohol dependence (1 study).
Seventy-three studies qualified for the review.
The studies looked at the relationship between either tax rates or total price on measures related to excessive alcohol consumption or its related harms.
The effects of prices on consumption or other outcomes are often expressed as "elasticities," that are defined as the expected percentage change in the outcome when the price increases by 1%. For example, an alcohol price elasticity of -0.50 would mean that the outcome of interest (e.g., alcohol consumption) would be expected to decrease by 5% for every 10% increase in price.
Alcohol price and per capita consumption:
• Price elasticity of alcohol consumption (i.e., the expected percentage change in alcohol consumption when the price increases by 1%)
-Beer consumption: -0.50 (interquartile interval [IQI]: -0.91 to -0.36; 18 studies)
-Wine consumption: -0.64 (IQI: -1.03 to -0.38; 22 studies)
-Spirits consumption: -0.79 (IQI: -0.90 to -0.24; 21 studies)
-Total alcohol (ethanol) consumption: -0.77 (IQI: -2.00 to -0.50; 11 studies)
• Price and consumption by high school or college age youth
-Six studies found consistent evidence that higher alcohol prices were associated with less youth drinking; 3 studies found mixed results (9 studies).
Alcohol price and alcohol-related harms:
• Higher alcohol prices or taxes were consistently related to:
-Fewer motor vehicle crashes and fatalities (10 of 11 studies)
-Less alcohol-impaired driving (3 of 3 studies)
-Less mortality from liver cirrhosis (5 of 5 studies)
-Less all-cause mortality (1 study)
• Effects also were demonstrated for measures of violence (3 studies), sexually transmitted diseases (1 study), and alcohol dependence (1 study).
About this Promising Practice
Primary Contact
The Community Guide
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS E69
Atlanta, GA 30329
404-498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html
1600 Clifton Rd, NE
MS E69
Atlanta, GA 30329
404-498-1827
communityguide@cdc.gov
http://www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html
Topics
Health / Alcohol & Drug Use
Community / Governance
Community / Governance
Source
Community Guide Branch Epidemiology and Analysis Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Location
USA
For more details
Target Audience
Teens, Adults